POLE DETERMINATIONS OF ASTEROIDS Per Magnusson Astronomiska Observatoriet Box 515 S-75120 Uppsala Sweden This is a comprehensive tabulation of determinations of asteroid pole orientations and senses of rotation. No weeding out of vague or uncertain results has been made. An indication of the reliability (or lack thereof) of the solutions may be obtained by comparing results derived from different sources of data (see column 2). Discussions of the individual pole determination methods, including their merits and weaknesses, are given in the chapter "Determination of Pole Orientations and Shape Parameters of Asteroids" appearing in this volume. Note when the letter is 'R', it is followed by a comment which fills the following field. POLE COORDINATES: These are given in the ecliptical reference frame of equinox 1950. For symmetry reasons, two-pole solutions often result for main-belt asteroids; thus two sub-columns are tabulated. In order to simplify comparison between results, the coordinates always refer to the pole above the orbital plane, and the pole longitude is occasionally given outside the range 0-360 degrees. The spin direction is indicated by proceeding the coordinates with the letter "N" if they refer to the north pole (direction of spin-vector) and the letter "S" if the coordinates refer to the south pole (anti-direction of spin-vector). Otherwise this byte contains a '-'. The word "rejected" indicates a pole solution shown to be inconsistent with observations. A pole solution within parenthesis is significantly less likely than the other solution. SENSE OF ROTATION: The sense of rotation is termed "Indeterminate" (I) when the spin direction is known, but the accuracy of the pole coordinates is insufficient to give an unambigous sense of rotation, or the pole is so close to the ecliptic and/or orbital plane that forced precession is likely to cause the sense of rotation to alternate on a time-scale short compared to the age of the planetary system. SIDEREAL PERIOD: Given in days. Due to the usually nonuniform time-distribution of the observations, sidereal periods tend to be either very accurate or, when the number of rotation cycles is wrongly determined, erroneous by hundreds of times the expected uncertainty. MODEL: Many pole determination methods are based on a triaxial ellipsoid model with semiaxes a>b>c that rotate about the c-axis. Corrections for non- geometric scattering and albedo variegation have often not been made. A warning must therefore be made against direct identification of the model axis-ratios with the asteroid shape. Values within parentheses are assumed model parameters and not determined values. An "A" in byte (71) indicates a quantitative model of albedo variegation. The table is not a comprehensive list of asteroid shapes and albedo models, but includes models obtained as by-products of pole determinations. This field contains other comments as well. Acknowledgments I thank Drs. R. Taylor, D.F. Lupishko and F.P. Velichko for pointing out several mistakes and omissions in an earlier version of the table and Dr. J. Drummond, who sent unpublished results.