J/ApJS/207/13       The spectrum and term analysis of V II       (Thorne+, 2013)
================================================================================
The spectrum and term analysis of V II.
    Thorne A.P., Pickering J.C., Semeniuk J.I.
   <Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 207, 13 (2013)>
   =2013ApJS..207...13T
================================================================================
ADC_Keywords: Atomic physics ; Line Profiles
Keywords: atomic data - line: formation - line: profiles

Abstract:
    The spectrum and extended term analysis of V II are presented. Fourier
    transform spectrometry was used to record high resolution spectra of
    singly ionized vanadium in the region 1492-5800 {AA} (67020-17260/cm)
    with vanadium-neon and vanadium-argon hollow cathode lamps as sources.
    The wavenumber uncertainty for the center of gravity of the strongest
    lines is typically 0.002/cm, an improvement of an order of magnitude
    over previous measurements. Most of the lines exhibit partly resolved
    hyperfine structure. The V II energy levels in the 1985 compilation of
    Sugar and Corliss have been confirmed and revised, with the exception
    of the high-lying 4f levels and eight of the lower levels. Thirty-nine
    of the additional eighty-five high levels published by Iglesias et al.
    (1988, Publicaciones del Instituto Optica Daza de Valdes Madrid, 47,
    1) have also been confirmed and revised, and three of their missing
    levels have been found. The energy uncertainty of the revised levels
    has been reduced by about an order of magnitude. In total, 176 even
    levels and 233 odd levels are presented.

Description:
    The laboratory spectra used in this analysis were recorded with the
    f/25 vacuum UV Fourier transform (FT) spectrometer at Imperial College
    over the region 16000-67000cm^-1^ (6320-1500{AA}). The infrared
    spectra recorded for us with the FT spectrometer at the National Solar
    Observatory (NSO), Kitt Peak, Tucson, Arizona (Brault
    1976JOSA...66.1081B), and used in the V I analysis as described in
    our previous paper (Thorne et al. 2011ApJS..192...11T), were included
    in the initial fitting, but almost all of the lines corresponding to
    possible V II transitions were doubly identified with strong V I
    transitions and therefore contributed very little to the V II
    analysis.

File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName   Lrecl  Records   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe         80        .   This file
table1.dat    100     1244   V.II (23.01) linelist of observed transitions
table2.dat    104      175   V.II (23.01) even energy levels
table3.dat    104      232   V.II (23.01) odd energy levels
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See also:
   J/ApJS/207/20 : Parity-forbidden [Co II] and [V II] lines (Ruffoni+, 2013)

Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  5  F5.2  [-]     Int     Intensity in arbitrary (decimal) log units
   7-  9  I3    ---     W       Width; guide to the line pattern width; 0.001/cm
  11- 14  I4    ---     SNR     Observed signal-to-noise ratio
  16- 24  F9.4  0.1nm   lambda  Wavelength; Angstroms (1)
  26- 34  F9.3  cm-1    sigma   Center-of-gravity vacuum transition wavenumber
  36- 40  F5.3  cm-1    O-C     Difference between observed and calculated
                                 wavenumbers
  42- 55  A14   ---     Conf0   Lower level configuration
  57- 65  A9    ---     Term0   Term and J value of the lower level
  67- 87  A21   ---     Conf1   Upper level configuration
  89- 97  A9    ---     Term1   Term and J value of the upper level
  99-100  A2    ---     Bl      Blend and doubly-identified line flag (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): In air for {lambda}>2000Angstroms (0.2um) and in vacuum
          below 2000 Angstroms.
Note (2): Flag as follows:
    D = a line doubly identified with another V II line;
   D1 = a line doubly identified with a V I line;
    B = blended with another nearby line;
    U = blended with an unknown feature.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Byte-by-byte Description of file: table[23].dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units  Label  Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 23  A23   ---    Conf   Assigned configuration
  25- 32  A8    ---    Term   Term
      34  I1    ---    J      [0/8] J value
  36- 40  A5    ---    Flag   Level flag (1)
  42- 50  F9.3  cm-1   E      Energy
  52- 55  F4.3  cm-1 e_E      ? Uncertainty in E
  57- 58  I2    ---    NL     [1/28]? Number of lines used (2)
  60- 62  I3    %      Eig1%  ? Percentage contribution of leading eigenvector
  64- 80  A17   ---    Eig2   Second most significant eigenvector
  82- 83  I2    %      Eig2%  ? Percentage contribution of secondary eigenvector
  85-101  A17   ---    Eig3   Third most significant eigenvector
 103-104  I2    %      Eig3%  ? Percentage contribution of tertiary eigenvector
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Flag as follows:
    new = a new level;
   new* = the ICL (Iglesias et al. 1988, Publicaciones del Instituto Optica
          Daza de Valdes Madrid, 47, 1) energy is discarded and replaced with a
          newly found level energy;
     SC = the energy level was reported by "SC" (Sugar, J. & Corliss, C. 1985,
          JPCRD, 14, 215) but is unconfirmed in this work.
    ICL = the energy level was reported by "ICL" (Iglesias et al. 1988,
          Publicaciones del Instituto Optica Daza de Valdes Madrid, 47, 1) but
          is unconfirmed in this work.
    Where level energies were reported in both "SC" and "ICL" but
    unconfirmed in this work the "ICL" values are given.
Note (2): To determine the energy level value in the energy level least
          squares fitting is indicated.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

History:
    From electronic version of the journal

================================================================================
(End)                 Greg Schwarz [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS]    09-Aug-2013
